Gathering in person to advance informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Assessment of the impact of a hygiene intervention on environmental sanitation, childhood diarrhoea, and the growth of children in rural Bangladesh

0 comments

Ahmed, N. U., M. F. Zeitlin, et al. (1994). "Assessment of the impact of a hygiene intervention on environmental sanitation, childhood diarrhoea, and the growth of children in rural Bangladesh." Food and Nutrition Bulletin 15(1): 40-52.

PURPOSE: A community-based hygiene intervention was developed and implemented in 5 villages of lowland Bangladesh with the objective of reducing childhood diarrhoea by altering ground sanitation and personal and food hygiene practices such as the washing of hands with ash before handling food and after defaecation-related activities, cutting fingernails, removing faeces from the child's body and from the yard, using tube-well water for preparing baby food and reducing supplementary feeding contamination by proper cleaning of bottles or avoiding bottle-feeding.

METHODS: The project area, typical of Bangladesh, was selected because of its poor hygiene and sanitation conditions and its high rates of diarrhoea and malnutrition. Baseline surveys of the subset of households with children 9-18 months old were conducted at the control site in July 1985 and at the intervention site in September. The intervention activities were carried out from January to July 1986. A final survey was conducted at both sites in August 1986, using the same questionnaire as for the baseline survey and the children who were then in the same age range, 9-18 months.

RESULTS: Both sites had higher cleanliness scores, lower diarrhoeal morbidity and better growth status at the end of the study period, but the improvement was greater at the intervention site. The effect at the control site may be attributed to the intensive observation exposures, mothers' education and socioeconomic conditions of the households, whereas the intervention site effects were most likely due to the intervention activities.

CONCLUSION: For evaluation of the effect of interventions, the repeat cross-sectional survey may be adequate for estimating relatively stable outcomes such as knowledge and practices, as well as cumulative growth status, but inadequate for fluctuating morbidity.