1 minute
Differences in the use of family planning methods by adolescent females according to the education model utilized during pregnancy. Monterrey, Mexico.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted to compare the use of family planning methods during the immediate postpartum period and 2 years following childbirth among adolescent females who had followed 2 different educational programmes during their pregnancies. 62 pregnant adolescents in Monterrey, Mexico, were selected and divided into 2 intervention groups: the PRECEDE model and Health Belief model (MCS) groups. Non-parametrical statistical tests were employed and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.
Results: The average points for knowledge in the MCS and PRECEDE groups were 69.12 (95% CI: 63.27-74.79) and 49.39 (95% CI: 71.12-79.38) before the intervention, and 89.71 (95% CI: 86.24-93.17) and 75.25 (95% CI: 71.12-79.38) after the intervention, respectively. In the immediate postpartum, 93% (95% CI: 83.5-100) and 94.2% (95% CI: 86.3-100) of adolescents in the PRECEDE and MCS groups accepted the use of a family planning method, respectively. After 2 years, the PRECEDE strategy had a greater effect than the MCS strategy (92 vs. 72%). There was a difference between models as regards the use family planning methods 2 years following childbirth.
Conclusion: The PRECEDE programme is proposed as the education strategy for the prevention of a second pregnancy among adolescent females.











































